From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 2 00:33:41 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 175341065673 for ; Sat, 2 Jun 2012 00:33:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dmagda@ee.ryerson.ca) Received: from eccles.ee.ryerson.ca (ee.ryerson.ca [141.117.1.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCC128FC0C for ; Sat, 2 Jun 2012 00:33:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.1.10] (bas2-toronto09-1176130977.dsl.bell.ca [70.26.85.161]) (authenticated bits=0) by eccles.ee.ryerson.ca (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q5206PoP035223 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 1 Jun 2012 20:06:26 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from dmagda@ee.ryerson.ca) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1278) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 From: David Magda In-Reply-To: <4FC8B67D.5090208@digsys.bg> Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2012 20:06:24 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <31DFBF41-37EC-43CF-A555-2D4E46F1F6E2@ee.ryerson.ca> References: <20120601121555.GF5335@home.opsec.eu> <4FC8B67D.5090208@digsys.bg> To: Daniel Kalchev X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1278) Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why Are You NOT Using FreeBSD ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Jun 2012 00:33:41 -0000 On Jun 1, 2012, at 08:33, Daniel Kalchev wrote: > For example if one wants an e-mail server, that is better served in = the long run by IMAP+MTA than any form of Exchange, because you are not = tied to one single platform and that vendor's lunacy. Otherwise FreeBSD = runs just fine as server for about any other OS client, provided those = clients use standard Internet protocols. If all you want is e-mail, then there are certainly better options than = Exchange IMHO. However, once you get into calendars (private and shared, = with delegation to secretaries, etc.), meeting rooms, ActiveSync (to = remotely wipe lost devices), then it's a whole different game. E-mail was solved a long time ago, but Exchange does many things on top = of it that many organizations find very handy, and where there doesn't = seem to be a decent open alternative.