From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 17 15:40:02 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88BF116A4E7 for ; Tue, 17 May 2005 15:40:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.gmx.net (pop.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 59F5843DB5 for ; Tue, 17 May 2005 15:40:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Emanuel.strobl@gmx.net) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 17 May 2005 15:39:55 -0000 Received: from flb.schmalzbauer.de (EHLO cale.flintsbach.schmalzbauer.de) [62.245.232.135] by mail.gmx.net (mp016) with SMTP; 17 May 2005 17:39:55 +0200 X-Authenticated: #301138 From: Emanuel Strobl To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 15:08:31 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 References: <4286313A.3080102@netfence.it> <9f2h819gnc2938un66cpouvnrbti39adsv@4ax.com> <4288B1C4.9030806@netfence.it> In-Reply-To: <4288B1C4.9030806@netfence.it> X-Birthday: Oct. 6th 1972 X-CelPhone: +49 (0) 173 9967781 X-Tel: +49 (0) 89 18947781 X-Country: Germany X-Address: Munich, 80686 X-OS: FreeBSD MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2335304.OIJ9jOnrZs"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200505171508.47897@harrymail> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 cc: Andrea Venturoli Subject: Re: NFS read-ahead? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 15:40:02 -0000 --nextPart2335304.OIJ9jOnrZs Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Am Montag, 16. Mai 2005 16:44 schrieb Andrea Venturoli: > Mike Tancsa wrote: > > Offhand, not really, but if you look around via google for > > mount_nfs freebsd "-r" a lot of people suggest r=3D32768,-w=3D32768. > > Perhaps use that as a starting point and experiment to see what gives > > you the best performance for your situation. > > Tried this: with simple tests it doesn't seem to make any difference. > I guess I'll have to investigate further. > Thanks for now. Try using TCP instead of UDP, this improoved throughput with large files a= =20 lot for me! Even without touching read and write sizes. =2DHarry > > bye > av. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" --nextPart2335304.OIJ9jOnrZs Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBCiezfBylq0S4AzzwRAgmSAJ9KPA+ak873Cv2lpBiK3pMlBCsgrwCfedjy G3oqK3VQH9nRWhljtyyuOW4= =T0KI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2335304.OIJ9jOnrZs--