Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 11:30:19 GMT From: Sergey Matveychuk <sem@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/94914: [maintainer] update net/gatekeeper to v2.2.3-2 Message-ID: <200603281130.k2SBUJoU080557@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR ports/94914; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Sergey Matveychuk <sem@FreeBSD.org> To: Joerg Pulz <Joerg.Pulz@frm2.tum.de> Cc: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/94914: [maintainer] update net/gatekeeper to v2.2.3-2 Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 15:25:06 +0400 Joerg Pulz wrote: > did you try to compile it on 4.11 with WITH_RADIUS=1 ? This code prevent it: .if ${OSVERSION} >= 500000 . if defined(WITH_RADIUS) CONFIGURE_ARGS+= --enable-radius . else CONFIGURE_ARGS+= --disable-radius . endif .endif But I'll try to disable it and recheck. > I found the rcNG problem yesterday when i was working on an update to > sysutils/nut*. > The rcNG script itself is correctly added to TMPPLIST but there is no > way to get the filename (gnugk or gnugk.sh) from bsd.port.mk without > doubling the effort and to do the same check, as in bsd.port.mk, in the > ports Makefile again. > I think this needs some twaeking to provide an easy way for porters to > run an rcNG script forcestop when the port gets deinstalled. I've proposed a solution: ports/93373. Let's wait for a portmgr's decision. -- Sem.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200603281130.k2SBUJoU080557>