From owner-freebsd-hackers  Wed Oct 18 22:43:32 1995
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id WAA05510
          for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 18 Oct 1995 22:43:32 -0700
Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU [136.152.64.181])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id WAA05466
          ; Wed, 18 Oct 1995 22:43:23 -0700
Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.12/8.6.9) id WAA02419; Wed, 18 Oct 1995 22:41:58 -0700
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 1995 22:41:58 -0700
Message-Id: <199510190541.WAA02419@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>
To: ache@astral.msk.su
CC: dawes@rf900.physics.usyd.edu.au, hackers@freebsd.org, rich@freebsd.org,
        jmz@freebsd.org
In-reply-to: <DnpjTXmGM5@ache.dialup.demos.ru>
Subject: Re: xterm dumps core
From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami)
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

Gosh, so many mails on this topic, but I'll reply to this one.

 * >If it is distributed as the standard source + patches which get applied
 * >at build time, then fine.  I'm not really worried about the run-time set.
 * 
 * Yes, it is distributed as standard tarred source and my patch applied
 * even at install time. But it is distributed as ready-to-run FreeBSD
 * binaries set too with my patch imbedded.

This is not correct.  As far as I know, Rich Murphey (who is getting
this mail via CC:), who is responsible for building XFree86 binaries
for the releases, is not using /usr/ports/x11/XFree86.  The latter was 
invented and maintained by Jean-Marc Zucconi.

 In particular, if you build from the one in ports, you won't get many
 of the programs on the contrib tape (most notably xload and xeyes).

I'm not sure what I should do on this, can you (Andrey) check with
Rich and Jean-Marc and make sure we are all in sync?  Or you guys
(Rich and Jean-Marc) can just reply to this mail.

Satoshi