From nobody Sun Aug 28 21:09:36 2022 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4MG5mg58Csz4bMvZ for ; Sun, 28 Aug 2022 21:09:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from grembo@freebsd.org) Received: from mail.evolve.de (mail.evolve.de [213.239.217.29]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA512 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mail.evolve.de", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4MG5mf56Hgz3q1p; Sun, 28 Aug 2022 21:09:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from grembo@freebsd.org) Received: by mail.evolve.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id d1e2c955; Sun, 28 Aug 2022 21:09:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.evolve.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id cb51da67 (TLSv1.3:AEAD-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO); Sun, 28 Aug 2022 21:09:37 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-6B9116D2-B48A-4CE9-BA44-9F2216AE4588 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Subject: Re: nginx-full version numbering question From: Michael Gmelin In-Reply-To: <6FB093FB-C867-4714-854A-7A03B021B83B@freebsd.org> Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2022 23:09:36 +0200 Cc: FreeBSD Message-Id: References: <6FB093FB-C867-4714-854A-7A03B021B83B@freebsd.org> To: Pete Wright X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (19G82) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4MG5mf56Hgz3q1p X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=softfail (mx1.freebsd.org: 213.239.217.29 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of grembo@freebsd.org) smtp.mailfrom=grembo@freebsd.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.60 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-0.999]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:213.239.192.0/18, country:DE]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; FREEFALL_USER(0.00)[grembo]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_SOFTFAIL(0.00)[~all]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[freebsd.org]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N --Apple-Mail-6B9116D2-B48A-4CE9-BA44-9F2216AE4588 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > On 28. Aug 2022, at 23:05, Michael Gmelin wrote: >=20 > =EF=BB=BF >=20 >=20 >>> On 28. Aug 2022, at 19:23, Pete Wright wrote: >>>=20 >> =EF=BB=BF hey there - i had a question about an apparent version numberin= g issue with the nginx-full port: >> https://www.freshports.org/www/nginx-full/ >>=20 >> on April 10th the version number is: 1.20.2_9,2 >> then on the next update (may 31) the version number seems to go backwards= : 1.22.0_10,2 >>=20 >=20 > Hi Pete, >=20 > What makes you think that 1.22.0 is smaller than 1.20.2? >=20 This simply looks like a case where PORTREVISION wasn=E2=80=99t reset after a= PORTVERSION update - but this shouldn=E2=80=99t cause any harm, as long as p= ortrevision isn=E2=80=98t lowered within the same portversion. > Cheers >=20 >=20 >=20 >> i was curious if that was intended? this makes it a little awkward to up= grade a locally patched version of the port from before May 31, as i'll have= to uninstall then install to pick up the latest upstream (which contains a f= ix i was patching out of tree). >>=20 >> thanks! >> -pete >> --=20 >> Pete Wright >> pete@nomadlogic.org >> @nomadlogicLA --Apple-Mail-6B9116D2-B48A-4CE9-BA44-9F2216AE4588 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 28. Aug 2022, at 23= :05, Michael Gmelin <grembo@freebsd.org> wrote:

=EF=BB=BF
=


On= 28. Aug 2022, at 19:23, Pete Wright <pete@nomadlogic.org> wrote:
<= br>
=EF=BB=BF =20 =20 =20 hey there - i had a question about an apparent version numbering issue with the nginx-full port:
https://www.freshports.org/www/nginx-full/

on April 10th the version number is: 1.20.2_9,2
then on the next update (may 31) the version number seems to go backwards: 1.22.0_10,2


Hi= Pete,

What makes you think that 1.22.0 is smaller t= han 1.20.2?


This s= imply looks like a case where PORTREVISION wasn=E2=80=99t reset after a PORT= VERSION update - but this shouldn=E2=80=99t cause any harm, as long as portr= evision isn=E2=80=98t lowered within the same portversion.

Cheers


=

i was curious if that was intended?  this makes it a little awkward to upgrade a locally patched version of the port from before May 31, as i'll have to uninstall then install to pick up the latest upstream (which contains a fix i was patching out of tree).

thanks!
-pete
 
--=20
Pete Wright
pe=
te@nomadlogic.org
@nomadlogicLA
=20
= --Apple-Mail-6B9116D2-B48A-4CE9-BA44-9F2216AE4588--