Date: Fri, 30 Jul 1999 17:48:41 -0600 From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> To: Alfred Perlstein <bright@rush.net> Cc: "Brian F. Feldman" <green@FreeBSD.ORG>, "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: So, back on the topic of enabling bpf in GENERIC... Message-ID: <199907302348.RAA85152@harmony.village.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 30 Jul 1999 19:44:54 EDT." <Pine.BSF.3.96.990730194407.20420V-100000@cygnus.rush.net> References: <Pine.BSF.3.96.990730194407.20420V-100000@cygnus.rush.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <Pine.BSF.3.96.990730194407.20420V-100000@cygnus.rush.net> Alfred Perlstein writes: : What about the one-way sysctls that have been suggested? They need to be implemente dfirst. A quick securelevel > 0 in bpf_open would allow many people's objections to bpf in the kernel by default. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199907302348.RAA85152>