From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Jan 4 16:20: 0 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from ducky.nz.freebsd.org (chilled.unixathome.org [203.79.82.27]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBCA915088 for ; Tue, 4 Jan 2000 16:19:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dan@freebsddiary.org) Received: from wocker (wocker.int.nz.freebsd.org [192.168.0.99]) by ducky.nz.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA60462; Wed, 5 Jan 2000 13:19:49 +1300 (NZDT) Message-Id: <200001050019.NAA60462@ducky.nz.freebsd.org> From: "Dan Langille" Organization: The FreeBSD Diary To: Colin Campbell Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2000 13:19:46 +1300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Subject: Re: two copies of bind or two name servers? Reply-To: dan@freebsddiary.org Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG References: <200001041035.XAA56537@ducky.nz.freebsd.org> In-reply-to: X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12a) Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Thanks colin. On 5 Jan 00, at 9:37, Colin Campbell wrote: > internal dns > - bind to 127.0.0.1 and internal interface > - forward to external interface At first I was getting: opensocket_f: bind([0.0.0.0].53): Address already in use Then I removed: query-source address * port 53; > external dns > - binds to external interface > - forward to isp > > resolver > - point to 127.0.0.1 or internal interface Seems to be fine here. However, I'm still partial to running named on two boxes. But that it yet to be decided. -- Dan Langille - DVL Software Limited [I'm looking for more work] The FreeBSD Diary - http://www.freebsddiary.org/freebsd/ NZ FreeBSD User Group - http://www.nzfug.nz.freebsd.org/ The Racing System - http://www.racingsystem.com/racingsystem.htm unix @ home - http://www.unixathome.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message