From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Jan 1 03:59:32 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id DAA07858 for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 1 Jan 1998 03:59:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from cheops.anu.edu.au (avalon@cheops.anu.edu.au [150.203.76.24]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id DAA07851 for ; Thu, 1 Jan 1998 03:59:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from avalon@coombs.anu.edu.au) Message-Id: <199801011159.DAA07851@hub.freebsd.org> Received: by cheops.anu.edu.au (1.37.109.16/16.2) id AA169995900; Thu, 1 Jan 1998 22:58:20 +1100 From: Darren Reed Subject: Re: mounting a FreeBSD partition on NetBSD or SunOS To: wilko@yedi.iaf.nl (Wilko Bulte) Date: Thu, 1 Jan 1998 22:58:20 +1100 (EDT) Cc: bsdean@gte.net, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <199801010954.KAA10709@yedi.iaf.nl> from "Wilko Bulte" at Jan 1, 98 10:54:45 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] Content-Type: text Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk In some mail from Wilko Bulte, sie said: > > As Brian Dean wrote... > > > > I have a few questions about filesystems created by one Unix variant > > and being mounting by another. I missed or delete the original, but anyway: /dev/wd0a 38991 30583 5289 85% / /dev/wd0s3f 347647 132834 187002 42% /usr /dev/wd0s3g 248175 112892 115429 49% /usr/local /dev/wd0s3h 198079 66882 115351 37% /usr/src /dev/wd0s3e 63567 11121 47361 19% /var procfs 4 4 0 100% /proc kernfs 1 1 0 100% /kern /dev/wd0s1 390864 333336 57528 85% /dos/c /dev/wd2s1 205380 78704 126676 38% /dos/d /dev/wd2s2a 29263 10858 16942 39% /netbsd /dev/wd2s2e 48463 25143 20897 55% /netbsd/var /dev/wd2s2f 175663 89254 77626 53% /netbsd/usr /dev/wd2s2g 96943 2776 89320 3% /netbsd/usr/local /dev/wd2s2h 230191 109871 108811 50% /netbsd/usr/src NetBSD can only deal with 1 BSD fdisk partition per disk, whereas FreeBSD can deal with multiple BSD fdisk partitions using slices. I only mount the NetBSD partitions read-only and when running NetBSD, mount the FreeBSD ones read-only. There are some subtle differences as to how the disklabels are organised, which can result in some error messages being dumped to the console when you mount them (I think that's when), depending on which versions of both operating systems are in use. Darren