From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 5 23:14:11 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 966711065672 for ; Fri, 5 Aug 2011 23:14:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from luigi@onelab2.iet.unipi.it) Received: from onelab2.iet.unipi.it (onelab2.iet.unipi.it [131.114.59.238]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59E1C8FC26 for ; Fri, 5 Aug 2011 23:14:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by onelab2.iet.unipi.it (Postfix, from userid 275) id 4CA427300A; Sat, 6 Aug 2011 01:31:44 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2011 01:31:44 +0200 From: Luigi Rizzo To: Victor Detoni Message-ID: <20110805233144.GA27117@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> References: <20110805002732.GA5340@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: High Network Perfomance X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2011 23:14:11 -0000 On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 04:07:22PM -0300, Victor Detoni wrote: > Hi Luigi, > > Thanks for reply. That's great solution :) Will be integrated with pf or is > it? unfortunately i don't have the time to do it, but as said in the thread it should not be terribly difficult. cheers luigi > Thanks, > Victor > > On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 9:27 PM, Luigi Rizzo wrote: > > > On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 08:39:17PM -0300, Victor Detoni wrote: > > > Hi Guys, > > > > > > I'm trying tunning a FreeBSD 8.2 to high perfomance network with pf. My > > > server configuration is: > > > > > > Dell 1950 > > > CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU 5130 @ 2.00GHz (1995.03-MHz > > K8-class > > > CPU) > > > 4 x CPU > > > 2 NIC ( > > 1 NIC (em0: ) > > > > > > I want to reach the high processing of packets per second and use pf as > > > synproxy and we still processor to handle others packets or flows. > > > > > > I know that em drivers has MULTI_QUEUE implementation that helps high > > > performance for Intel drivers, but I couldn't see more information about. > > We > > > can reached 500k pps, but no more traffic was processed by this > > interface. > > > > > > I've already enabled net.isr.direct but with Intel Drivers does not work > > and > > > the most processors are in System instead of Interrupts, why? When I > > enable > > > net.isr.direct the processing is balanced for on CPU in system and > > another > > > in interrupt and I reached 1M pps, but the total perfomance is down, the > > > load grow up too fast. > > > > > > I've changed some parameter in sysctl for intel drivers, but it doesn't > > have > > > effect. > > > > > > Someone know what I can do to reach more packets performance? I want to > > use > > > this FreeBSD as a router/firewall only. > > > > if you feel like doing a bit of coding yourself, you could try netmap > > > > http://info.iet.unipi.it/~luigi/netmap/ > > > > cheers > > luigi > > > > > Thanks, > > > Victor > > > _______________________________________________ > > > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > > freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"