From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Apr  6 16:33:04 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D212237B401
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Sun,  6 Apr 2003 16:33:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3921C43F93
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Sun,  6 Apr 2003 16:33:04 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from des@ofug.org)
Received: by flood.ping.uio.no (Postfix, from userid 2602)
	id 762D45308; Mon,  7 Apr 2003 01:33:02 +0200 (CEST)
X-URL: http://www.ofug.org/~des/
X-Disclaimer: The views expressed in this message do not necessarily
  coincide with those of any organisation or company with
  which I am or have been affiliated.
To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org>
Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2003 01:33:02 +0200
In-Reply-To: <20030407081351.V2224@gamplex.bde.org> (Bruce Evans's message
 of "Mon, 7 Apr 2003 08:25:27 +1000 (EST)")
Message-ID: <xzpel4fdwwh.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090015 (Oort Gnus v0.15) Emacs/21.2
References: <xzpu1dbeflv.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
	<xzpel4fmqu9.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
	<20030407081351.V2224@gamplex.bde.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
cc: current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: weird fxp / timecounter interaction in top-of-tree
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Apr 2003 23:33:05 -0000

Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> writes:
> Do any other attach routines get called on rescan?  I would expect most of
> them to do the wrong thing.

The problem was that the piix driver's *probe* routine did the attach
work and got called on rescan, not that its attach routine got called
on rescan.

DES
-- 
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org