Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2003 01:33:02 +0200 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: weird fxp / timecounter interaction in top-of-tree Message-ID: <xzpel4fdwwh.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: <20030407081351.V2224@gamplex.bde.org> (Bruce Evans's message of "Mon, 7 Apr 2003 08:25:27 %2B1000 (EST)") References: <xzpu1dbeflv.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <xzpel4fmqu9.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <20030407081351.V2224@gamplex.bde.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> writes: > Do any other attach routines get called on rescan? I would expect most of > them to do the wrong thing. The problem was that the piix driver's *probe* routine did the attach work and got called on rescan, not that its attach routine got called on rescan. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpel4fdwwh.fsf>