From owner-cvs-all Mon Jul 15 16:39:45 2002 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2488737B401; Mon, 15 Jul 2002 16:39:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from canning.wemm.org (canning.wemm.org [192.203.228.65]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A230943E4A; Mon, 15 Jul 2002 16:39:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from peter@wemm.org) Received: from fw.wemm.org (canning.wemm.org [192.203.228.65]) by canning.wemm.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8752A2A7D6; Mon, 15 Jul 2002 16:39:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from peter@wemm.org) Received: from overcee.wemm.org (overcee.wemm.org [10.0.0.3]) by fw.wemm.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44F3E4C26C; Mon, 15 Jul 2002 16:39:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from peter@wemm.org) Received: from wemm.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by overcee.wemm.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED4A73811; Mon, 15 Jul 2002 16:39:37 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from peter@wemm.org) X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 To: Alexey Dokuchaev Cc: Doug Barton , Alexandr Kovalenko , cvs-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/contrib/bind CHANGES INSTALL Makefile README Version src/contrib/bind/bin Makefile src/contrib/bind/bin/addr addr.c src/contrib/bind/bin/dig dig.c src/contrib/bind/bin/dnskeygen dnskeygen.c src/contrib/bind/bin/dnsquery ... In-Reply-To: <20020715223408.E53266@regency.nsu.ru> Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 16:39:37 -0700 From: Peter Wemm Message-Id: <20020715233937.ED4A73811@overcee.wemm.org> Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 03:30:04AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: > > Alexandr Kovalenko wrote: > > > > > > Hello, Doug Barton! > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 01:01:49AM -0700, you wrote: > > > > > > > dougb 2002/07/15 01:01:49 PDT > > > > > > > > Modified files: (Branch: RELENG_4_4) > > > And how about RELENG_4_3 and RELENG_3 ? > > > > I definitely will not be doing releng_3, I have no machines to test the > > build on, and my personal feeling is that no one should be using > > releng_3 anyway. 4.3 came out in april 2001, which is over a year ago. > > Actually, I've always been under impression that essential security > problems should be addressed in every stable branch, that is, RELENG_2_2, > and RELENG_3, not to mention RELENG_4*. I've seen recent commit to > RELENG_2_2, showing exactly this point AFAIR. Actually, RELENG_2_2 is a bit unusual since it is the last of the a.out systems, and there are people still stuck with it. Doing best-effort fixes there does help some folks. But RELENG_3 has no such redeeming features. 4.x is what 3.x should have been and lived way longer than it should have (and caused lots of pain and suffering in the process). If it wasn't for historical value, I'd love to detag the branch that it is on. Or at least rename them or something. Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - peter@wemm.org; peter@FreeBSD.org; peter@yahoo-inc.com "All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars" - JMS/B5 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message