Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2019 17:39:55 -0700 From: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> To: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> Cc: "Rodney W. Grimes" <freebsd-rwg@pdx.rh.cn85.dnsmgr.net>, freebsd@bdragon.rtk0.net, "freebsd-toolchain@FreeBSD.org" <freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: External GCC Update Message-ID: <CANCZdfq55vyAzNq%2BYC6cse1BPGA0%2BZyzFPSmBcNM71hDCZh64Q@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1c77e30e-5bf1-fb33-ecbc-367749f78e74@FreeBSD.org> References: <201902221945.x1MJjwlE026969@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net> <1c77e30e-5bf1-fb33-ecbc-367749f78e74@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Feb 22, 2019, 5:09 PM John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> wrote: > On 2/22/19 11:45 AM, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: > >> I was recently able to install base/binutils and base/gcc into an amd64 > VM > >> and do a self-hosted build and install. Some of the port patches have > been > >> committed from this, but I have some source patches before the final > ports > >> patches can be finished. > >> > >> The source patches are here: > >> https://github.com/bsdjhb/freebsd/compare/master...base_gcc > > > > Phabricator? > > Eventually, wanted a first cut of the entire patchset in context to see if > folks run screaming or not. > Thank you. Phabricator isn't good with larger patches. Git let's me see things in a number of different views that are hard with the one size fits all phab ui. Warner -- > John Baldwin > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-toolchain > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-toolchain-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CANCZdfq55vyAzNq%2BYC6cse1BPGA0%2BZyzFPSmBcNM71hDCZh64Q>