Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 30 Sep 2006 21:56:11 +1000 (EST)
From:      Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
To:        John-Mark Gurney <gurney_j@resnet.uoregon.edu>
Cc:        freebsd-net@freebsd.org, Randall Stewart <rrs@cisco.com>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Andre Oppermann <andre@freebsd.org>, gallatin@cs.duke.edu
Subject:   Re: Much improved sosend_*() functions
Message-ID:  <20060930215218.V1683@epsplex.bde.org>
In-Reply-To: <20060929231007.GS80527@funkthat.com>
References:  <451C4850.5030302@freebsd.org> <Pine.BSF.4.58.0609281928020.20971@niwun.pair.com> <451D884F.1030807@cisco.com> <20060929213722.GR80527@funkthat.com> <451D973C.8070004@freebsd.org> <20060929231007.GS80527@funkthat.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 29 Sep 2006, John-Mark Gurney wrote:

> Andre Oppermann wrote this message on Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 23:59 +0200:
>> mbufs are 256 bytes.
>
> Hmmm.. I keep getting this confused... maybe because there was discussion
> about increasing this a few years back...  or maybe because NOTES has
> it as 512.. :)

It would be a bug if NOTES had the default size.  Notes is supposed to
alter defaults so that non-default code paths get tested.  It often uses
the default plus 1 or the default times 2 (the latter when the value must
be a power of 2).

Bruce



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060930215218.V1683>