From nobody Wed Oct 15 17:23:37 2025 X-Original-To: pkgbase@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4cmyc21Wdrz6Cj2y; Wed, 15 Oct 2025 17:23:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ivy@freebsd.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::24b:4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "R13" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4cmyc163JSz3y5R; Wed, 15 Oct 2025 17:23:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ivy@freebsd.org) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1760549025; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=YjgLb6wHspQLttk+l+YgJNJDTqUl44J5xLp/JGapwIo=; b=alseABdmuk7OxxAPlT8OQGD2fz3rZNEThlG4RiDn62oxAIQLq7V3uMdh5tku3hfD++5FJI Sb94D0HkzbfHliz+5qINxL2V1mYXgLt+bqgx2PeecDHzcCQ3SJywTa/g2Vv/kUsq3tokDo MZw8Zkvtvzhe0SzHdqZuNByaNtJj9eKFszJ00gBMhpdwhKBzslzNk+74PGaKB6hJEJ9dsl 7ygVtXVPms1prfzr1Rh3/MM7yhM1VF05rfSNN7V/q7wBaazIeUAT3N7il+05Hpo6OrpaTE 8IPjmdPy8wS6bNR3L7x+59vdxHJ4tOPV+mZcsDbVfO4vltPO+8h14/VUpRBAMA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1760549025; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=YjgLb6wHspQLttk+l+YgJNJDTqUl44J5xLp/JGapwIo=; b=HDshYk8so24DMy9VIyr1QMKiBV+01hpoKwx3qh6wnG7MsgeN85iNexQ4ZDwLDWZslO/KlR fH2yP7YM4AWMdIC2U5P0LKJ8ps9O3Xkv/onQ/EevwlfJi/9rRzgXeZxuToLSVKKalQr7p7 nkNsYbepK8bKMdIC/59r8M1h++lnDrN4yZtncehPYBHTpxeST1G8f9jltxA7MshLqb2k0t NojSJYs1LauoFSZLy3HmM4YzOcrcvPYE0jivYedf9MJLPW/pPPsr3Dt0VFgRPQlv0fHENu Y2R9+oLn2qmKMMrlhSUtYVmC5x/LUto71Fbpy5+SRJQXp2gPYpB6ImbNqYtJdg== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1760549025; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=DJTYUx4AXFHFdglwNxM+Z/ehNY2IWOmiQW+JdAV2yd8Q/nN7H0O+852F5wnffZeZ/BDjt7 5f39cATxjkss3qpI+GkUUlRMKGeFyjqh/b5hmMSmMjqNFee8budPV87ATlDqNv5A00vSVn jOyjg60o0xOttjg6JYVe8V3eP3RucJ67oYYRMMphtpQc/AByURkjB5jTOMCWCABiG3rTOp c5wI2usbO2YYvH5WMaPq71XsNFeOGXyFHsutTIHPb86NTnzs+TV2gvWVVN8ChptWAz0sWC KjBGdJ7SPoqNJTLsPgNqb+rHMZIl/joEfS0kiKSCqturoVbQS3mqiPEUYuUV0A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none Received: from amaryllis.le-fay.org (amaryllis.le-fay.org [IPv6:2a00:1098:6b:400::9]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: ivy/mail) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4cmyc126VhzG9c; Wed, 15 Oct 2025 17:23:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ivy@freebsd.org) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2025 18:23:37 +0100 From: Lexi Winter To: Roger Marquis , Ronald Klop , current@freebsd.org, pkgbase@freebsd.org Subject: Re: should FreeBSD-dhclient depend on FreeBSD-resolvconf? Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: Roger Marquis , Ronald Klop , current@freebsd.org, pkgbase@freebsd.org References: <43B68BB6-02FA-470E-A8C5-99D15E3707D7@FreeBSD.org> <89861E7A-64C7-47CB-89F6-A93AB14813FF@FreeBSD.org> <3E63F63B-0C90-43E2-BF55-30310B7599D3@FreeBSD.org> <7r257p26-qqs6-r1q3-9456-qn3o02rson6r@mx.roble.com> List-Id: Packaging the FreeBSD base system List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-pkgbase List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-pkgbase@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="xRuoIOtLaVCkKrhp" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: --xRuoIOtLaVCkKrhp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Lexi Winter wrote in : > Roger Marquis wrote in : > > On Wed, 15 Oct 2025, Lexi Winter wrote: > > > we will never ship a set for a "minimal jail" because this is entirely > > > up to the user requirements. there is *no* package which is absolute= ly > > > required to install a jail, because it depends on what you will insta= ll > > > in the jail. so it doesn't make sense to ship any sort of package set > > > like this. > >=20 > > How could it not make sense when 'distroless' Linux container images are > > so popular? >=20 > i have no idea what a "distroless Linux container image" is. could you > please describe this in more detail? i asked another committer about this, and they explained that a "distroless Linux container image" is a container image which only contains basic system files like /etc/passwd and /etc/resolv.conf, for use with a statically-linked application, like a Go app. this is something i would like to support in pkgbase and am actively working on, but it has nothing to do with sets, at least not right now. certainly, if we do support this in pkgbase, it will have nothing to do with the "minimal" set. does that make sense? --xRuoIOtLaVCkKrhp Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEABYKAB0WIQSyjTg96lp3RifySyn1nT63mIK/YAUCaO/YlQAKCRD1nT63mIK/ YOOQAQDjiXLsZzwjKx88LXl0XbATyU1TmHngj4NfCzogxcugLwD+Jy4QqUXyPCnD yC2i6VGu2utwOhcKJm5mOukcHZ8PUwQ= =7UOW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --xRuoIOtLaVCkKrhp--