From owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 30 07:43:38 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02A8116A4F0 for ; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 07:43:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from pilchuck.reedmedia.net (pilchuck.reedmedia.net [209.166.74.74]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 931F743D49 for ; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 07:43:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from reed@reedmedia.net) Received: from reed by pilchuck.reedmedia.net with local-esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 1B8LOn-0007VT-00; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 07:43:33 -0800 Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 07:43:33 -0800 (PST) From: "Jeremy C. Reed" To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20040330101519.R2711@beck.quonix.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Re: The Website X-BeenThere: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD Evangelism List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 15:43:38 -0000 On Tue, 30 Mar 2004, John Von Essen wrote: > And... It doesn't help when they go to freebsd.org. It makes FreeBSD seem > NON-enterprise. Personally, i think the site is fine, but Im a tech, not > a CTO. Maybe, freebsd.com can be redesigned have a suse.com or redhat.com > look-n-feel, and freebsd.org can retain - the developer community > look-n-feel. This thread was already discussed this last year. Someone already volunteered and made a new webpage (for .com). I am sure the archives have the link (although I don't know if the website is still up). Jeremy C. Reed http://bsd.reedmedia.net/