From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 4 08:28:01 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D9118A70 for ; Mon, 4 Aug 2014 08:28:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C0FA52408 for ; Mon, 4 Aug 2014 08:28:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.8/8.14.8) with ESMTP id s748S1jf049131 for ; Mon, 4 Aug 2014 08:28:01 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 191895] [ext2fs] [panic] ext2_dirbad: /mnt: bad dir ino 32787 at offset 6136: mangled entry Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2014 08:28:01 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0-CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: pho@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Needs Triage X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2014 08:28:01 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191895 --- Comment #4 from Peter Holm --- (In reply to Pedro F. Giffuni from comment #2) > I think it may be related to the new htree implementation. > > It would be good to confirm this by disabling the directory indexing (with > e2tunefs from the e2fsprogs port), and re-running the test. > > Thanks for the detailed report, BTW. You are welcome. Indeed, tune2fs -O ^dir_index /dev/md... make the test run without a panic. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.