Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 10:50:27 +0100 From: Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com> To: Douglas Thrift <douglas@douglasthrift.net> Cc: Tim Bishop <tim@bishnet.net>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Porting gitolite Message-ID: <CADLo83-KkwTRHmEn990kvvn3XPObGJAapeSoDoNtPGfF6M4aXg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4E18EAD2.1030700@douglasthrift.net> References: <20110709112937.GA4859@carrick-users.bishnet.net> <4E18EAD2.1030700@douglasthrift.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 10 Jul 2011 01:21, "Douglas Thrift" <douglas@douglasthrift.net> wrote: > > On 7/9/2011 4:29 AM, Tim Bishop wrote: > > Hi Douglas, > > > > I was thinking about porting gitolite to the FreeBSD ports tree and I > > notice you've done gitosis. For gitosis you have a specific user: > > > > % grep git /usr/ports/{UIDs,GIDs} > > /usr/ports/UIDs:git:*:211:211::0:0:gitosis user:/usr/local/git:/bin/sh > > /usr/ports/GIDs:git:*:211: > > > > It seems to make sense to me to use the git user for gitolite as well > > (for the same reasons you used it for gitosis). So I thought I'd ping > > you to see if you had any thoughts or concerns about that? > > > > The only thing that might need changing is the gecos field in the UIDs > > file, maybe to something like "gitosis/gitolite user". > > > > Thanks for reading, > > > > Tim. > > > > Hello Tim, > > I don't think there should be any problem, but I've CCed the FreeBSD > ports mailing list to see if anyone else has any thoughts on the matter. Loads of ports share usernames anyway, shouldn't be a problem. Personally I wouldn't bother changing the gecos though. Chris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CADLo83-KkwTRHmEn990kvvn3XPObGJAapeSoDoNtPGfF6M4aXg>