From owner-freebsd-ports  Tue Apr  2  7: 0:16 2002
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@hub.freebsd.org
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 118CE37B417
	for <freebsd-ports@hub.freebsd.org>; Tue,  2 Apr 2002 07:00:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from gnats@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g32F05S22128;
	Tue, 2 Apr 2002 07:00:05 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from gnats)
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2002 07:00:05 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <200204021500.g32F05S22128@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org
Cc: 
From: Alan E <alane@geeksrus.net>
Subject: Re: ports/36589: www/pyweblib: use current python [maintainer approves]
Reply-To: Alan E <alane@geeksrus.net>
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-ports.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-ports>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-ports>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

The following reply was made to PR ports/36589; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Alan E <alane@geeksrus.net>
To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org
Cc: Alan Eldridge <ports@geeksrus.net>
Subject: Re: ports/36589: www/pyweblib: use current python [maintainer approves]
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2002 09:59:18 -0500

 I received the following mail agreeing with the patch from the
 maintainer. Since it has his OK, let's apply the patch and close this
 PR. Thanks.
 
 From: Oddbjorn Steffensen <oddbjorn@tricknology.org>
 To: Alan Eldridge <ports@geeksrus.net>
 Subject: Re: www/pyweblib: use current python
 
 On Sun, Mar 31, 2002 at 03:28:05PM -0500, Alan Eldridge wrote:
 > The www/pyweblib port has an explicit force of
 > PYTHON_VERSION=python2.1.  The package seems to build and install fine
 > on current python (2.2_1), and there is no indication on the
 > software's home page (last updated Feb 2002) of any incompatibility
 > with 2.2.
 
 I did this to avoid a legacy 1.6 installation I had on my machine,
 but forgot to correct it prior to submitting the port. Thanks for
 spotting it.
 
 
 > This is one of the few (< 5) packages which specifically require 2.1,
 > and I don't see a reason for that to persist.
 
 Agreed.
 
 -oddbjorn
 
 -- 
 AlanE
 "When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro." - HST

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message