Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2016 11:29:34 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 210505] graphics/opencv: Update to 3.1 Message-ID: <bug-210505-13-X4M11KxIeP@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-210505-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-210505-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D210505 --- Comment #33 from Mathieu Arnold <mat@FreeBSD.org> --- The documentation says : Can mean want/needs/passed/failed exp-run by portmgr: * Set (?) to request an exp-run * Set (+) means exp-run PASSED * Set (-) means exp-run FAILED (new failures, regressions) FAILED (-) means you cannot commit the patch before fixing failures or regressions. In that case, there was no need to do an exp-run, so the flag should be removed. Or the doc needs to be changed, but having the meaning of (-) change from "= NO, PLEASE FIX" to "NO, PLEASE FIX, OR DO IT ANYWAY" feels like a bad idea. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-210505-13-X4M11KxIeP>