From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Oct 16 11:48:25 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9364E16A4CE
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Sat, 16 Oct 2004 11:48:25 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from mail.gmx.net (pop.gmx.de [213.165.64.20])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 58B9443D41
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Sat, 16 Oct 2004 11:48:24 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from michaelnottebrock@gmx.net)
Received: (qmail 30917 invoked by uid 65534); 16 Oct 2004 11:48:22 -0000
Received: from pD95D8E6D.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO lofi.dyndns.org)
	(217.93.142.109)
	by mail.gmx.net (mp016) with SMTP; 16 Oct 2004 13:48:22 +0200
X-Authenticated: #443188
Received: from kiste.my.domain (lofi@kiste.my.domain [192.168.8.4])
	(authenticated bits=0)
	by lofi.dyndns.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i9GBmlxT016612
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO);
	Sat, 16 Oct 2004 13:48:47 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from michaelnottebrock@gmx.net)
From: Michael Nottebrock <michaelnottebrock@gmx.net>
To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, obrien@freebsd.org
Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2004 13:48:10 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.7
References: <416C0DE8.3000004@struchtrup.com>
	<20041014162539.GD1301@FreeBSD.org> <20041016081928.GA80039@dragon.nuxi.com>
In-Reply-To: <20041016081928.GA80039@dragon.nuxi.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
  boundary="nextPart2038136.CLn07jzDt3";
  protocol="application/pgp-signature";
  micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <200410161348.11392.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new
cc: Eivind Eklund <eivind@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: alternative options for ports
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2004 11:48:25 -0000

--nextPart2038136.CLn07jzDt3
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On Saturday 16 October 2004 10:19, David O'Brien wrote:

>I think our slave
> ports is a fine solution issues like this.

=46ull ack. A one to one mapping of portdir<->package is always preferrable=
 to=20
some obfuscated logic and Makefile spaghetti code that just magically=20
produces more than one package from one port.

=2D-=20
   ,_,   | Michael Nottebrock               | lofi@freebsd.org
 (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve     | http://www.freebsd.org
   \u/   | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org

--nextPart2038136.CLn07jzDt3
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.9.10 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQBBcQp7Xhc68WspdLARAqEKAJ41N3bwiDLkBVCfJvZzTyVgUZhqXgCfTeOq
0e3F193/nQghCrK4NDbHeQQ=
=5JZn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart2038136.CLn07jzDt3--