From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Feb 15 10:53:20 1996 Return-Path: owner-stable Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id KAA15124 for stable-outgoing; Thu, 15 Feb 1996 10:53:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from asstdc.scgt.oz.au (root@asstdc.scgt.oz.au [202.14.234.65]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id KAA15119 for ; Thu, 15 Feb 1996 10:53:15 -0800 (PST) Received: (from imb@localhost) by asstdc.scgt.oz.au (8.6.12/BSD4.4) id FAA22591; Fri, 16 Feb 1996 05:53:05 +1100 From: michael butler Message-Id: <199602151853.FAA22591@asstdc.scgt.oz.au> Subject: Re: arp and async problems To: nate@sri.MT.net (Nate Williams) Date: Fri, 16 Feb 1996 05:53:05 +1100 (EST) Cc: nate@sri.MT.net, stable@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <199602151821.LAA00383@rocky.sri.MT.net> from "Nate Williams" at Feb 15, 96 11:21:43 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24beta] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-stable@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk > > So you're telling me that I can now use .. > > ifconfig ep0 inet 202.12.127.225 netmask 255.255.255.240 > > ifconfig ep0 inet 202.12.127.226 alias netmask 255.255.255.240 > > ifconfig ep0 inet 202.12.127.227 alias netmask 255.255.255.240 > > : > > : > > .. this didn't work before (I tried it), does it now ? > I don't believe so. Then there are few remaining options .. if the above doesn't work and a netmask of 255.255.255.255 doesn't work yet you say that I may not need to split them out .. sorry, now I am confused .. what _does_ work ? > What does 'ifconfig -a' return, and what alias's are you trying to use? Currently it's primary address is 202.12.127.70 with no aliases in that subnet (I simply don't have enough "spare" in this one). Under 2.1R (generic kernel), it says .. pcm:~ % /sbin/ifconfig -a ep0: flags=863 mtu 1500 inet 202.12.127.70 netmask 0xfffffff0 broadcast 202.12.127.79 lo0: flags=8009 mtu 16384 inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 sl0: flags=c010 mtu 552 tun0: flags=8010 mtu 1500 It is (naturally) the ep0 interface which presently carries all the other aliases. However, I could accomodate another ethernet card to carry the WWW and DNS stuff for the other aliases (currently, .225 through .238). What I (obviously) need to know is how this is to be constructed since the method that used to work no longer does. Am I really the only one who uses aliases this extensively ? michael