From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 15 20:43:24 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 057FC37B42A for ; Tue, 15 Jul 2003 20:43:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay.pair.com (relay.pair.com [209.68.1.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D4A6243F93 for ; Tue, 15 Jul 2003 20:43:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from silby@silby.com) Received: (qmail 39206 invoked from network); 16 Jul 2003 03:43:21 -0000 Received: from niwun.pair.com (HELO localhost) (209.68.2.70) by relay.pair.com with SMTP; 16 Jul 2003 03:43:21 -0000 X-pair-Authenticated: 209.68.2.70 Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 22:42:47 -0500 (CDT) From: Mike Silbersack To: Scot Loach In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20030715224117.E19149@odysseus.silby.com> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org cc: 'Don Lewis' Subject: RE: Kernel tuning for large maxsockets X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 03:43:24 -0000 On Tue, 15 Jul 2003, Scot Loach wrote: > True, I can add a tunable for each of tcp, udp, raw, divert. That's probably a good idea, I'm sure I'll end up messing with it a bit once you send it to me. :) > What will happen when the system runs out of pcbs? I think it should handle everything fine. Mike "Silby" Silbersack