From owner-freebsd-current Sun Apr 21 08:59:52 1996 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id IAA23654 for current-outgoing; Sun, 21 Apr 1996 08:59:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id IAA23647 for ; Sun, 21 Apr 1996 08:59:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.7.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id IAA05328 for ; Sun, 21 Apr 1996 08:59:40 -0700 (PDT) To: current@freebsd.org Subject: Another 2.2-SNAP soon, folks? Date: Sun, 21 Apr 1996 08:59:39 -0700 Message-ID: <5325.830102379@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Modulo the problem with ip_output.c that I expect Garrett will want to work on, and my own final attempts to repair sysinstall (now that I've gone to the new menuing scheme), does anyone else have any objection to a 2.2-SNAP being done sometime within the next 7 days? I'm thinking something like 2.2-960428-SNAP, assuming, of course, that -current is stable enough to snapshot on that date. Goals of this snapshot are to: 1. Get Justin's latest Adaptec support code out in bootable/installable form. 2. See what people think of the cosmetic changes to sysinstall. 3. Get John's latest VM enhancements out there. 4. Get the rundos stuff out in what's at least an experimental form. 5. Whatever other justifications I manage to come up with in the next 7 days.. :-) Any objections / reports of known brokenness which would make this a bad time for a SNAP? Jordan