From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 16:46:41 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD81F16A4CE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 16:46:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from jk.homeunix.net (dhcp-19-33.dsl.CSUChico.EDU [132.241.19.33]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 543CD43D55 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 16:46:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jk@jk.homeunix.net) Received: from jk.homeunix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])i0E0kWqW022013 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 16:46:33 -0800 (PST) Received: (from warlock@localhost)i0E0kW3m022012 for freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 16:46:32 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 16:46:32 -0800 From: John Kennedy To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040114004632.GB80120@memnoch.jk.homeunix.net> References: <20040112132544.D54803@pooker.samsco.home> <20040113225632.GA80120@memnoch.jk.homeunix.net> <200401140029.27160.max@love2party.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200401140029.27160.max@love2party.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 17:07:57 -0800 Subject: Re: FreeBSD CVS Question (answered!) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 00:46:41 -0000 > From: Max Laier > > Make sure to have "cvsroot-all" in your sup-file as well, that should provide > all the needed information to get the ids right. You nailed it in one shot. I missed cvsroot-all just having done the cvs init and not even thinking to check for extra filesets. Now the files check out with the right expansions. Thanks! > From: Garance A Drosihn > > Sad to say, I suspect you did a lot of extra work that you could > have avoided. Doing work, even needless work sometimes, is where I learn things. (: > It depends on what you mean by "a local CVS checkout". On the > machines which are doing a CVS checkout, how are they getting > to your local copy of the CVS repository? If that repository > is NFS-mounted, then you are probably in good shape. If your > machines are doing a CVS checkout over RSH or SSH, then your > server may be doing a LOT more work than you realize. Right now it is just on the same machine. You're right that SSH would probably involve extra overhead such as the encryption (at least for SSH). I've tended to avoid NFS since the bad old days of RPC problems ( like 10 years ago), so perhaps I'll give that a try again. (: > But really, you'd probably be better off investigating the > cvsup-mirror port. It did not take me too long to setup, > and it has worked very well for me. After reading and digging, it is like one supfile in a crontab plus the CVS checkout. > From: Tim Kientzle > > Don't use RCS, use CVS. I am using CVS. I figured that RCS did the $-header conversion on the far side (under the control of CVS). I was wrong -- apparently that was under the control of something that I picked up when I included "cvsroot-all".