From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 23 13:40:45 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (unknown [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFE19106564A for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 13:40:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.187.76.162]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 698128FC2F for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 13:40:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from russet.local (reflex.squiz.co.uk [83.217.109.164]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id p5NDeYSW077941 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 14:40:40 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.3 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk p5NDeYSW077941 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=201001-infracaninophile; t=1308836440; bh=/Y0ND3rYpDlAsPmRGzBQ7QG2ism/wGZppavLGmSP8yw=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Cc:Content-Type:Date:From:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Mime-Version:References:To; z=Message-ID:=20<4E034252.8030406@infracaninophile.co.uk>|Date:=20T hu,=2023=20Jun=202011=2014:40:34=20+0100|From:=20Matthew=20Seaman= 20|User-Agent:=20Mozilla/5.0=20(M acintosh=3B=20U=3B=20Intel=20Mac=20OS=20X=2010.6=3B=20en-US=3B=20r v:1.9.2.18)=20Gecko/20110616=20Thunderbird/3.1.11|MIME-Version:=20 1.0|To:=20freebsd-questions@freebsd.org|Subject:=20Re:=20Mozilla=2 0retires=20Firefox=204=20from=20security=20support|References:=20< 20110623075223.3b439423@scorpio>=20<19971.11087.811956.446957@jeru salem.litteratus.org>|In-Reply-To:=20<19971.11087.811956.446957@je rusalem.litteratus.org>|X-Enigmail-Version:=201.1.1|Content-Type:= 20multipart/signed=3B=20micalg=3Dpgp-sha1=3B=0D=0A=20protocol=3D"a pplication/pgp-signature"=3B=0D=0A=20boundary=3D"------------enigC 61C881927CEFFDDB7A7D074"; b=ZLrOk/3lPf0sI70k5I+HoJ+OPXQUzEoxpxjnO4kbLuODLEMKxCHmaKbNDFk9qfOV+ wgNYwlxsxq79t56MpYKF/Gi5Jhg0QtWCNWSSFsK2DlsDAdFCqvhf83vvGapC+0Xu9B hJU/GkhpOxXOGFWms3/fWMUgJILadtBycZiIztBc= X-Authentication-Warning: lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk: Host reflex.squiz.co.uk [83.217.109.164] claimed to be russet.local Message-ID: <4E034252.8030406@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 14:40:34 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110616 Thunderbird/3.1.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20110623075223.3b439423@scorpio> <19971.11087.811956.446957@jerusalem.litteratus.org> In-Reply-To: <19971.11087.811956.446957@jerusalem.litteratus.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigC61C881927CEFFDDB7A7D074" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,SPF_FAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Subject: Re: Mozilla retires Firefox 4 from security support X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 13:40:46 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigC61C881927CEFFDDB7A7D074 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 23/06/2011 13:02, Robert Huff wrote: > My morning-fogged mind says Version 4 was out less than a year. Much less than a year. V4 came out in April. I'm wondering what the big deal is that Mozilla felt they needed to bump the major version number? There don't seem to have been many user visible changes between 4 and 5, and (only seen momentarily flashing past, so may not be correct) the delta between 4 and 5 that my Mac downloaded was only about 10MB. That doesn't seem to me to add up to the sort of large scale reworking that a major version bump should imply.= Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enigC61C881927CEFFDDB7A7D074 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.14 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk4DQlIACgkQ8Mjk52CukIzeygCdE1GiLmJ0/ttyTJhVgddjXBBY 3i0AnRvGDUlZL3KwwuCyunBu8m9ONnKO =Q7B8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigC61C881927CEFFDDB7A7D074--