From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 27 13:02:59 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBB8B1065676 for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 13:02:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from reko.turja@liukuma.net) Received: from www.liukuma.net (www.liukuma.net [62.220.235.15]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 975F58FC17 for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 13:02:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from reko.turja@liukuma.net) Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by www.liukuma.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDB1A1CCB2; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 16:00:04 +0300 (EEST) Received: from www.liukuma.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (www.liukuma.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id eDfsUnWZZnHD; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 16:00:03 +0300 (EEST) Received: from rivendell (a88-114-132-159.elisa-laajakaista.fi [88.114.132.159]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: ignatz@www.liukuma.net) by www.liukuma.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C2991CCB0; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 16:00:03 +0300 (EEST) Message-ID: From: "Reko Turja" To: , "JD Bronson" References: <200807271132.m6RBWmF4076016@cheyenne.hanadarko.com><6EE319AEA79D42F49038FE83B14E841F@rivendell> <200807271213.m6RCDSlt001639@cheyenne.hanadarko.com> Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 16:03:32 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 12.0.1606 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V12.0.1606 Cc: Subject: Re: 7.0-make.conf X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 13:02:59 -0000 > WITHOUT_SENDMAIL=true > > I am not sure of the need for the 'true' or not. it seems it is not > required but should work either way? >From the manpage: The values of variables are ignored regardless of their setting; even if they would be set to ``FALSE'' or ``NO''. Just the existence of an option will cause it to be honoured by make(1). so the plain option is enough. If the machines are in environment where they might be someday administered by someone else, I'd use pure option to avoid confusing someone who hasn't read the manpage and thinks setting variables to false will void them. -Reko