From owner-cvs-all Sun Apr 8 4:41: 4 2001 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.163]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAD7437B422; Sun, 8 Apr 2001 04:40:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f38BesC97383; Sun, 8 Apr 2001 13:40:54 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/fs/pseudofs pseudofs.c pseudofs.h pseudofs_fileno.c pseudofs_internal.h pseudofs_vncache.c pseudofs_vnops.c In-Reply-To: Your message of "08 Apr 2001 12:04:40 +0200." Date: Sun, 08 Apr 2001 13:40:54 +0200 Message-ID: <97381.986730054@critter> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message , Dag-Erling Smorgrav writes: >Poul-Henning Kamp writes: >> What does it do ? > >It supplies a common framework for procfs, linprocfs and other similar >fs'es (e.g. kernfs, if we hadn't nuked it). For instance, out of >~2200 lines of code in linprocfs (comments and license included), >there are only about 700 that are specific to linprocfs; the rest is >copied verbatim from procfs (or was originally, but it has drifted a >bit since then) So basically the "UFS" off pseudo-FS's ? -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message