Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 17:58:32 -0500 (EST) From: Charles Swiger <chuck@pkix.net> To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: ports/59150: Revive sysutils/clean... Message-ID: <200311102258.hAAMwWCR079780@ns1.pkix.net> Resent-Message-ID: <200311102300.hAAN0cl4083677@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Number: 59150 >Category: ports >Synopsis: Revive sysutils/clean... >Confidential: no >Severity: serious >Priority: medium >Responsible: freebsd-ports-bugs >State: open >Quarter: >Keywords: >Date-Required: >Class: maintainer-update >Submitter-Id: current-users >Arrival-Date: Mon Nov 10 15:00:38 PST 2003 >Closed-Date: >Last-Modified: >Originator: Charles Swiger >Release: FreeBSD 4.9-RC i386 >Organization: PKIx >Environment: System: FreeBSD ns1.pkix.net 4.9-RC FreeBSD 4.9-RC #5: Fri Oct 17 18:45:19 EDT 2003 root@ns1.pkix.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/NORMAL i386 >Description: Please refer to original submission, ports/52881, and recent email on the <ports@freebsd.org> mailing list: On Nov 7, 2003, at 9:06 PM, Oliver Eikemeier wrote (in response to me): >How-To-Repeat: N/A. >Fix: The port as submitted (using the name "clean", not "clean_") should work, but diffs from the current state follow: --- clean_/Makefile Mon Nov 10 17:50:39 2003 +++ clean/Makefile Mon Nov 10 17:51:33 2003 @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ # # $FreeBSD: ports/sysutils/clean_/Makefile,v 1.2 2003/10/06 00:50:47 edwin Exp $ -PORTNAME= clean_ +PORTNAME= clean PORTVERSION= 3.2 CATEGORIES= sysutils MASTER_SITES= ${MASTER_SITE_SOURCEFORGE} ...or: --- clean_/Makefile Mon Nov 10 17:50:39 2003 +++ clean/Makefile Mon Nov 10 17:54:46 2003 @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ PORTVERSION= 3.2 CATEGORIES= sysutils MASTER_SITES= ${MASTER_SITE_SOURCEFORGE} -MASTER_SITE_SUBDIR= ${PORTNAME} +MASTER_SITE_SUBDIR= clean DISTNAME= clean-${PORTVERSION} MAINTAINER= chuck@pkix.net >Release-Note: >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted: >> To recap: the port as submitted works fine, but the name 'clean' broke the >> generation of the ports INDEX. I believe the port was renamed in CVS via a >> repocopy to 'clean_', while Oliver Eikemeier kindly looked into and produced >> a patch to bsd.port.subdir.mk which seemed to resolve the bug with >> generating INDEX. What I should do next to address Bill Fenner's scripted >> email...? :-) > > You have three possibilities, listed in order of (my personal) preference: > > 1.) You could revive sysutils/clean, it should work now (PR 57438 is > committed) > 2.) You could name your port clean instead of clean_ > 3.) You could use clean instead of ${PORTNAME} for MASTER_SITE_SUBDIR
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200311102258.hAAMwWCR079780>