From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 26 15:09:25 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C648C106566B for ; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 15:09:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tretuliy2@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pb0-f54.google.com (mail-pb0-f54.google.com [209.85.160.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97C938FC12 for ; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 15:09:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pbcwz17 with SMTP id wz17so7056449pbc.13 for ; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 08:09:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=ZWLppKXx+yFKxpFeU5tsvfWwyrnBcNJ2jzDYzaToVpw=; b=mjfiCb8oR1KmBJwGcgbQxlsW7hqYoFm3Xq3dhmdm72DISLlKPTX92oW6bQ7JDpBZOT rhkRGci5Hox0YYRwNH/cGRX0QeNa+rHsNL4qZYiNdRrIc9Pi1LIRrURf1oELwSGHqt64 HidKjyT3ydGKdDu2bkvTgLpTmnXvmpK1LCJaRmul2Sr4quOG+ibjkgfagM1MMErB1R9I tgYWgWeDv2jQz7IvMD9OChtGd+bCL+HdOvXg+HShQljEaxRqxuUwYqB3p+t/Do3LJ7PI jevIfKPQEV3B1z8dvbeW8TREwsAiA6MZKqmdDTxd95iSea2vMVYR6R0StxBlIlw7/IJL h+Ww== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.223.33 with SMTP id qr1mr53883758pbc.47.1332774559863; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 08:09:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.143.83.8 with HTTP; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 08:09:19 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <8904.1332769428.5720084203749900288@ffe15.ukr.net> Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 18:09:19 +0300 Message-ID: From: =?KOI8-R?B?98HEyc0g9dLB2sHF1w==?= To: net@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: The problem with MTU <1500 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 15:09:25 -0000 You may use this patch to ipfw http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=103454 Or you may use ng_patch netgraph node (man ng_patch(4) should give you some examples) The simpliest way to do what you want is pf rule scrub in on em0 no-df performance of all those methods you should check by youre self.