From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Oct 9 14:20:50 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id OAA00897 for questions-outgoing; Thu, 9 Oct 1997 14:20:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions) Received: from alpo.whistle.com (alpo.whistle.com [207.76.204.38]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id OAA00889 for ; Thu, 9 Oct 1997 14:20:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from julian@whistle.com) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by alpo.whistle.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id OAA02239; Thu, 9 Oct 1997 14:17:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from current1.whistle.com(207.76.205.22) via SMTP by alpo.whistle.com, id smtpd002233; Thu Oct 9 21:17:11 1997 Message-ID: <343D4991.446B9B3D@whistle.com> Date: Thu, 09 Oct 1997 14:16:01 -0700 From: Julian Elischer Organization: Whistle Communications X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0Gold (X11; I; FreeBSD 2.2-CURRENT i386) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Annelise Anderson CC: Greg Lehey , Robert Rusk , freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Linux vs freeBSD References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Annelise Anderson wrote: > > On Thu, 9 Oct 1997, Julian Elischer wrote: > > > Annelise Anderson wrote: > > > > > > > > > Is the FreeBSD network code still better than Linux? > > > > not really. The NFS code still lags. > > they re-wrote their networking top work along similar lines toours > > (except with a more modern approach) it works well. > > > I think maybe what I meant was the TCP/IP stuff....which at one > time was supposed to be better....is the answer to that different? > > AA That's what they rewrote. basically, because we were embarrasing them.. that's why 2 systems is an advantage..