From owner-freebsd-current Mon Mar 26 3: 9:18 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mass.dis.org (mass.dis.org [216.240.45.41]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10F3237B719 for ; Mon, 26 Mar 2001 03:09:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from msmith@mass.dis.org) Received: from mass.dis.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mass.dis.org (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f2Q6qC600975; Sun, 25 Mar 2001 22:52:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from msmith@mass.dis.org) Message-Id: <200103260652.f2Q6qC600975@mass.dis.org> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 To: Warner Losh Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: newcard/cardbus instabilities In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 25 Mar 2001 14:26:33 MST." <200103252126.f2PLQXZ71514@billy-club.village.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2001 22:52:11 -0800 From: Mike Smith Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > In message <200103230046.f2N0kkD00621@mass.dis.org> Mike Smith writes: > : This looks OK, though you might want to disable the pccard support, since > : it's known to be broken right now. > > pccard support is not broken right now. If there's a "known" issue, I > sure don't know about it. Oh, sorry, I'm obviously out of date. The problem that Johny was seeing was that 'device pccard' causes broken interrupt delivery for cardbus cards. If that's meant to work, I can see if I can reproduce it locally. -- ... every activity meets with opposition, everyone who acts has his rivals and unfortunately opponents also. But not because people want to be opponents, rather because the tasks and relationships force people to take different points of view. [Dr. Fritz Todt] V I C T O R Y N O T V E N G E A N C E To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message