From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Mar 10 00:59:56 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id AAA04737 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 10 Mar 1997 00:59:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from thelab.hub.org ([207.107.138.222]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id AAA04726 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 1997 00:59:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from thelab.hub.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thelab.hub.org (8.8.5/8.8.2) with SMTP id EAA07193; Mon, 10 Mar 1997 04:59:45 -0400 (AST) Date: Mon, 10 Mar 1997 04:59:45 -0400 (AST) From: The Hermit Hacker To: Tom Samplonius cc: Joe McGuckin , hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd as a news server? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Sun, 9 Mar 1997, Tom Samplonius wrote: > > On Sun, 9 Mar 1997, Joe McGuckin wrote: > > > I was having the same problem with expire taking over 18 hours to complete. > > Ok. For the *entire* expiration process, right? > > > Someone suggested forcing expire to rebuild the history database using a > > different spindle for temp space. > > > > That fixed it. Now the history rebuild finishes in under 5 minutes. > > Errr... but the history rebuild is always the easiest and fastest part > of the expiration process. The fastrm and expireover is the time > consuming part. > This is, of course, assuming that Joe is using the 'delayrm' option, which it sounds like he isn't/wasn't, if expire was running 18hrs...