From nobody Mon Aug 29 05:38:58 2022 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4MGK4Q19hrz4bKNB for ; Mon, 29 Aug 2022 05:39:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from SRS0=apQd=ZB=klop.ws=ronald-lists@realworks.nl) Received: from smtp-relay-int.realworks.nl (smtp-relay-int.realworks.nl [194.109.157.24]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4MGK4N5Hrsz3SsW for ; Mon, 29 Aug 2022 05:39:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from SRS0=apQd=ZB=klop.ws=ronald-lists@realworks.nl) Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2022 07:38:58 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=klop.ws; s=rw2; t=1661751539; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to; bh=W0QbNwlYA15U2jZV8qM7MlTlXqcNs31g/X6lyu8xTNc=; b=wXbUsca5+c5LewJwr/zXzsNV2rPHmoHn7pa/wCFJ7447FDaebl30Vx9+4uwehWu2BurGud CVhFQ2Dj7dEsvZ3YehOatB8tBp4BzrDM1FRp+N9fk+1gu7Dr2tkEmirdiUJ0xC36FG+w4i Ut1MFVoC/CKphGJ/GVPNnxnM0VyUYwZLnkPSxtfi3fWrZCQg3WCTNgbNxiEutLUzX1rLmL t5Q15HatD6c0K38cZMe9i92+mxfuAd+/SVftqfaQ0/LnodUu8NAYwJKo1wRSFYpBc+2vhY 6ePkNG/vZUQU7dP0dqeE+vJPOMPmNxBSo8NdHzwliu8dkBpWYYUQLPS2a3UXOg== From: Ronald Klop To: "Michael A. Oshin" , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <544599794.198.1661751538961@localhost> In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: New Port: Security/liblurch & Security/Pidgin-lurch List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_197_1345904151.1661751538958" X-Mailer: Realworks (621.117) Importance: Normal X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4MGK4N5Hrsz3SsW X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=klop.ws header.s=rw2 header.b=wXbUsca5; dmarc=pass (policy=quarantine) header.from=klop.ws; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of "SRS0=apQd=ZB=klop.ws=ronald-lists@realworks.nl" designates 194.109.157.24 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="SRS0=apQd=ZB=klop.ws=ronald-lists@realworks.nl" X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.19 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.999]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-0.999]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.99)[-0.993]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[klop.ws,quarantine]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[ronald-lists@klop.ws,SRS0=apQd=ZB=klop.ws=ronald-lists@realworks.nl]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:194.109.157.0/24]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[klop.ws:s=rw2]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[gmail.com,freebsd.org]; RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[klop.ws:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; HAS_X_PRIO_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:3265, ipnet:194.109.0.0/16, country:NL]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[ronald-lists@klop.ws,SRS0=apQd=ZB=klop.ws=ronald-lists@realworks.nl] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N ------=_Part_197_1345904151.1661751538958 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, Login to https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/click Report an update or defect to a port upload a diff or archive of the port file. And wait for a committer to pick it up. Regards, Ronald Van: "Michael A. Oshin" Datum: 29 augustus 2022 04:11 Aan: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Onderwerp: Re: New Port: Security/liblurch & Security/Pidgin-lurch > > > > > Good Morning Folks, > I now have lurch built over Poudriere; please see https://paste.mozilla.org/EcEH1jPw. > I enabled portlint and developer_mode. > > > How do I push this to freshports? > > > Is there anything else to do? > > > On Sat, 27 Aug 2022 at 21:33, Felix Palmen wrote: > >> * Michael A. Oshin [20220827 20:32]: >> > Maybe, pidgin-lurch & liblurch go to net-im >> > while libomemo etc remain in the security category. >> >> They make sense in both categories. Maybe you could argue net-im is the >> better choice for the primary category because even in context security, >> you can't use this software for anything other than messaging. >> >> Just two more quick notes on this: >> >> 1. The upstream project name is lurch, not liblurch. Avoid to name the >> port differently, it might be confusing for users (and forces you to >> override variables like DISTNAME, WRKSRC, etc which would be unnecessary >> otherwise). Already renamed in my patches btw. >> >> 2. I didn't look at pidgin-lurch at all. >> >> Cheers, Felix >> >> -- >> Felix Palmen {private} felix@palmen-it.de >> -- ports committer (mentee) -- {web} http://palmen-it.de >> {pgp public key} http://palmen-it.de/pub.txt >> {pgp fingerprint} 6936 13D5 5BBF 4837 B212 3ACC 54AD E006 9879 F231 > > > ------=_Part_197_1345904151.1661751538958 Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi,

Login to https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/<= br class=3D"rw_extra" />click Repor= t an update or defect to a port 

upload a diff= or archive of the port file. And wait for a committer to pick it up.

Regards,

Ronald


=

Van: "Michael A. Oshin" <micadeyeye= @gmail.com>
Datum: 29 augustus 2022 04:11
Aan: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Onderwerp: Re: New Port: Security/liblurch & Security/Pidgin-lurch

Good Morning Folks,
I now have lurch built o= ver Poudriere; please see https://paste.mozilla.org/EcEH1jPw.
I enabled portlin= t and developer_mode.

How = do I push this to freshports?

Is there anything else to do?

On Sat, 27 Aug 2022 at 21:33, Felix Pa= lmen <zirias@freebsd.org> wrote:
<= /div>
* Michael A. Oshin &= lt;micadeyeye@gmail.com= > [20220827 20:32]:
>                    &= nbsp;       Maybe, pidgin-lurch & liblurch go to net-im<= br /> > while libomemo etc remain in the security category.

They make sense in both categories. Maybe you could argue net-im is the
better choice for the primary category because even in context security, you can't use this software for anything other than messaging.

Just two more quick notes on this:

1. The upstream project name is lurch, not liblurch. Avoid to name the
port differently, it might be confusing for users (and forces you to
override variables like DISTNAME, WRKSRC, etc which would be unnecessary otherwise). Already renamed in my patches btw.

2. I didn't look at pidgin-lurch at all.

Cheers, Felix

--
 Felix Palmen <zirias@FreeBSD.org>     {private}&= nbsp;  felix@palmen-it.de<= /a>
 -- ports committer (mentee) --          &nbs= p; {web}  http://pal= men-it.de
 {pgp public key}  http://palmen-it.de/pub.txt
 {pgp fingerprint} 6936 13D5 5BBF 4837 B212  3ACC 54AD E006 9879 = F231



------=_Part_197_1345904151.1661751538958--