From owner-svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 13 07:21:21 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 302561065673; Sat, 13 Dec 2008 07:21:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kientzle@freebsd.org) Received: from kientzle.com (kientzle.com [66.166.149.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06A748FC17; Sat, 13 Dec 2008 07:21:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kientzle@freebsd.org) Received: from [10.123.2.23] (p53.kientzle.com [66.166.149.53]) by kientzle.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id mBD7LKtv081686; Fri, 12 Dec 2008 23:21:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kientzle@freebsd.org) Message-ID: <4943626C.5000005@freebsd.org> Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 23:21:16 -0800 From: Tim Kientzle User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20060422 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: John Baldwin References: <200812060657.mB66vjXM086176@svn.freebsd.org> <200812081148.00728.jhb@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <200812081148.00728.jhb@freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r185682 - head/lib/libarchive X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 07:21:21 -0000 John Baldwin wrote: > On Saturday 06 December 2008 01:57:45 am Tim Kientzle wrote: > >>Author: kientzle >>Date: Sat Dec 6 06:57:45 2008 >>New Revision: 185682 >>URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/185682 >> >>Log: >> Strip ";1" and trailing "." from ISO9660 entries. >> This seems a better match for people's expectations. > > Err, maybe strip whatever version is present? The '1' is a version number and > in theory you can have newer versions. I think the intention was to allow > replacing files by growing an ISO fs with version '2' files "replacing" > version '1', etc. My thinking here was that if you have different versions, then you probably care about the versions. In that case, it seems the right thing is to keep enough version numbers so the files can still be disambiguated. Of course, it's probably a moot point; I'd be surprised to ever see a disc that actually has multiple version numbers. Tim