From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Mon Apr 10 20:59:38 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A89FAD37626 for ; Mon, 10 Apr 2017 20:59:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peter.blok@bsd4all.org) Received: from smtpq1.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net (smtpq1.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net [212.54.42.164]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C2EEB6C4 for ; Mon, 10 Apr 2017 20:59:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peter.blok@bsd4all.org) Received: from [212.54.34.120] (helo=smtp12.mnd.mail.iss.as9143.net) by smtpq1.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cxgPO-0006Gb-7V; Mon, 10 Apr 2017 22:59:34 +0200 Received: from 5ed15678.cm-7-2b.dynamic.ziggo.nl ([94.209.86.120] helo=wan0.bsd4all.org) by smtp12.mnd.mail.iss.as9143.net with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cxgPO-0004Tv-5f; Mon, 10 Apr 2017 22:59:34 +0200 Received: from newnas (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wan0.bsd4all.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D72BE719F; Mon, 10 Apr 2017 22:59:33 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at bsd4all.org Received: from wan0.bsd4all.org ([127.0.0.1]) by newnas (newnas.bsd4all.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bn_4cYY7IzIV; Mon, 10 Apr 2017 22:59:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.1.64] (mm [192.168.1.64]) by wan0.bsd4all.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E18EA7196; Mon, 10 Apr 2017 22:59:31 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\)) Subject: Re: VNET branch destiny From: peter.blok@bsd4all.org In-Reply-To: <58EBE6E6.8060008@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2017 22:59:30 +0200 Cc: Pavel Timofeev , "Bjoern A. Zeeb" , freebsd-current Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <0136F3BE-4B47-4677-8D81-3FE0F5E67E79@lists.zabbadoz.net> <24B3E322-5B92-470D-A1D6-10DF8EF79490@bsd4all.org> <58EB8D98.5050904@gmail.com> <75BD8407-83AC-4383-912A-70083CED3FFD@bsd4all.org> <58EBE6E6.8060008@gmail.com> To: Ernie Luzar X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273) X-SourceIP: 94.209.86.120 X-Ziggo-spambar: / X-Ziggo-spamscore: 0.0 X-Ziggo-spamreport: CMAE Analysis: v=2.2 cv=Baeo6vl2 c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=IkzOOneQUJP1+bAPekPvBg==:17 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=AzvcPWV-tVgA:10 a=pGLkceISAAAA:8 a=6Q3WNqvRAAAA:8 a=Npu8PpBfyOLFG9ZBfWYA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=6kGIvZw6iX1k4Y-7sg4_:22 a=I8PBwKCn76L9oNdl0isp:22 none X-Ziggo-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Flag: No X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2017 20:59:38 -0000 No problem. Although pf is not used the vnet_destroy seems to be the = issue. Some parts are not virtualized and the = vnet_destroy->vnet_pf_uninit teardown happens on the host vnet so to = speak. > On 10 Apr 2017, at 22:11, Ernie Luzar wrote: >=20 > peter.blok@bsd4all.org wrote: >> Well, in my case it panic=E2=80=99ed on 11-stable. I=E2=80=99m only = using pf on the host, not in the jail. I=E2=80=99m using Devin Teske=E2=80= =99s jng to create a netgraph bridge. It is my intention to use the = netgrpah bridge with bhyve as well. >=20 >=20 > I also tested using Devin Teske=E2=80=99s jng to create a netgraph = bridge on > RELEASE 10.0 and it worked. But when I tried the same configuration on > RELEASE 11.0 it no longer worked. >=20 > Sorry for the noise. I missed this sentence. "I=E2=80=99m only using = pf on the > host, not in the jail.". Thats what happens when I answer email after = a long day at work. >=20 >=20