From owner-svn-src-head@freebsd.org Sat Jul 29 15:22:58 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14013DC5BB2; Sat, 29 Jul 2017 15:22:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from srs0=pmua=7a=freebsd.org=kp@codepro.be) Received: from venus.codepro.be (venus.codepro.be [IPv6:2a01:4f8:162:1127::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.codepro.be", Issuer "Gandi Standard SSL CA 2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D3C3F6EF28; Sat, 29 Jul 2017 15:22:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from srs0=pmua=7a=freebsd.org=kp@codepro.be) Received: from [10.0.2.164] (ptr-8ripyyewexqkewvy3sy.18120a2.ip6.access.telenet.be [IPv6:2a02:1811:2419:4e02:2106:f3e4:9b75:26c2]) (Authenticated sender: kp) by venus.codepro.be (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C959DBB01; Sat, 29 Jul 2017 17:22:55 +0200 (CEST) From: "Kristof Provost" To: "Harry Schmalzbauer" Cc: src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r320802 - head/etc/rc.d Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2017 17:22:53 +0200 Message-ID: <4C595496-31A5-476A-9D3B-3CD85E9A198D@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <597CA7A3.4050404@omnilan.de> References: <201707080928.v689SV93013507@repo.freebsd.org> <597CA7A3.4050404@omnilan.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; markup=markdown Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer: MailMate (2.0BETAr6089) X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2017 15:22:58 -0000 On 29 Jul 2017, at 17:20, Harry Schmalzbauer wrote: > Bezüglich Kristof Provost's Nachricht vom 08.07.2017 11:28 > (localtime): >> Author: kp >> Date: Sat Jul 8 09:28:31 2017 >> New Revision: 320802 >> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/320802 >> >> Log: >> Allow more services to run in vnet jails >> > Do you (or somebidy else) plan to MFC this, along with r320696? > Valuable "extension" IMHO. > I have no plans to, no. I’m not terribly confident that vnet is sufficiently robust in stable/11 to encourage people to use it. There are a number of vnet bugs that are fixed (or being worked on) in CURRENT that still affect stable/11. Regards, Kristof