From owner-freebsd-net  Sat Oct  7 17: 9:38 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from coconut.itojun.org (coconut.itojun.org [210.160.95.97])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id A3DA237B68D; Sat,  7 Oct 2000 17:07:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kiwi.itojun.org (localhost.itojun.org [127.0.0.1])
	by coconut.itojun.org (8.9.3+3.2W/3.7W) with ESMTP id JAA06079;
	Sun, 8 Oct 2000 09:07:20 +0900 (JST)
To: Archie Cobbs <archie@whistle.com>, freebsd-net@freebsd.org,
	developers@freebsd.org
In-reply-to: itojun's message of Sun, 08 Oct 2000 09:05:49 JST.
      <6051.970963549@coconut.itojun.org>
X-Template-Reply-To: itojun@itojun.org
X-Template-Return-Receipt-To: itojun@itojun.org
X-PGP-Fingerprint: F8 24 B4 2C 8C 98 57 FD  90 5F B4 60 79 54 16 E2
Subject: Re: header bogosity in <net/radix.h>
From: itojun@iijlab.net
Date: Sun, 08 Oct 2000 09:07:20 +0900
Message-ID: <6077.970963640@coconut.itojun.org>
Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org


>>Isn't this bogus? For example, it conflicts with any program that
>>#defines Free() for itself. Apparenly some of these C files
>>(sys/net/radix.c, sys/net/route.c, sys/net/rtsock.c) are used in
>>both kernel and userland compilation.
>>
>>What is the correct way to do this?
>
>	I had the same problem with compiling with openssl headers, on netbsd.
>
>	if i were you, i'd remove "!_KERNEL" case, and define those in kernel
>	compilation only.

	i believe this was here so that we can share radix.[ch] among
	sys/net, and sbin/routed.

itojun


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message