From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 17 21:42:12 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E5431065670 for ; Mon, 17 Nov 2008 21:42:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andre@wensing.org) Received: from mail.wensing.org (wensing.xs4all.nl [80.101.217.189]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A6848FC08 for ; Mon, 17 Nov 2008 21:42:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andre@wensing.org) Received: from localhost (localhost.wensing.org [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wensing.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10CC45C070; Mon, 17 Nov 2008 22:43:56 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at wensing.org Received: from mail.wensing.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ananke.wensing.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id x+FDtTzTZjUc; Mon, 17 Nov 2008 22:43:48 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.1.14] (atlas.wensing.org [192.168.1.14]) by mail.wensing.org (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 483C55C069; Mon, 17 Nov 2008 22:43:48 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4921E593.3030206@wensing.org> Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 22:43:47 +0100 From: Andre Wensing User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (X11/20080925) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jeremy Chadwick References: <4921C5F1.8070906@wensing.org> <20081117195947.GA38547@icarus.home.lan> In-Reply-To: <20081117195947.GA38547@icarus.home.lan> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: INDEX has lower version of ports than installed ones X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 21:42:12 -0000 Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 08:28:49PM +0100, Andre Wensing wrote: >> Does anyone know if INDEX has been updated recently? For some reason >> `pkg_version -IvL =` reports me that I've got newer ports than INDEX has: >> >> server# pkg_version -IvL = >> amavisd-new-2.6.1_1,1 > succeeds index (index has 2.6.1,1) >> cyrus-sasl-2.1.22_2 > succeeds index (index has 2.1.22_1) >> cyrus-sasl-saslauthd-2.1.22_1 > succeeds index (index has 2.1.22) >> dcraw-8.88 > succeeds index (index has 8.86) >> dirmngr-1.0.2 > succeeds index (index has 1.0.1_2) >> dovecot-1.1.3_1 > succeeds index (index has 1.1.3) >> mysql-client-5.0.67_1 > succeeds index (index has 5.0.67) >> mysql-server-5.0.67_1 > succeeds index (index has 5.0.67) >> pcre-7.8 > succeeds index (index has 7.7_1) >> postfix-2.5.5,1 > succeeds index (index has 2.5.4,1) >> rrdtool-1.3.3 > succeeds index (index has 1.3.1) >> squirrelmail-1.4.16 > succeeds index (index has 1.4.15_1) >> >> >> server# uname -a >> FreeBSD server.home.local 6.4-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 6.4-PRERELEASE #6: Wed >> Sep 24 06:04:20 CEST 2008 >> root@server.home.local:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 >> >> How can this be? The ports-tree has thawed, right (at least, according >> to the release-schedule for 6.4)? > > When you update your ports via csup (not sure about portsnap), the INDEX > file **is not** updated. > > You can either rebuild it yourself (make index), or you can fetch it by > doing "make fetchindex". I prefer the latter. > Thanx. A `make fetchindex` and a `portsdb -fu` (after deleting the existing INDEX-6.db) did the trick. Stupid I didn't think of this earlier, but it bugged me fr 2 weeks and couldn't figure out why... Sorry for the noise. Dré