From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Fri Oct 13 14:14:36 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55AE2E4949E for ; Fri, 13 Oct 2017 14:14:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42AC9662F6 for ; Fri, 13 Oct 2017 14:14:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v9DEEZ6S093213 for ; Fri, 13 Oct 2017 14:14:36 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 222805] [NEW PORT] dns/dns2blackhole: Malware Prevention through Domain Blocking Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2017 14:14:36 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-patch, needs-qa X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: joeb1@a1poweruser.com X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.isobsolete flagtypes.name attachments.created Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2017 14:14:36 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D222805 joeb1@a1poweruser.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #186930|0 |1 is obsolete| | Attachment #187134| |maintainer-approval+ Flags| | --- Comment #2 from joeb1@a1poweruser.com --- Created attachment 187134 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D187134&action= =3Dedit update shar file Just a little note to guide your ports work. In 10 years of submitting ports you are the first one to request Makefile syntax changes. It's understood that you are empowered to fix these simple syntax errors on the fly and go ahead and commit the port. Your wasting your time and mine time cycling such miner fixes back to the submitter. That portlite is over sensitive and is nothing but a guide, not intended to be u= sed in the manner you are using it. You have to execute some judgement, not bli= ndly follow some words in some book. Your number of committed ports will rise as= you will have more time to process more ports just by using a little judgement = and correcting those simple syntax error your self just like the other committe= rs do. This is one of those un-documented rules that experienced commenters follow. How do you think some of those commenters get such high number of commits per month? I can guarantee you it's not by cycling every nit syntax error back to the submitter over and over again. Be assertive, take charge, correct everything in the port make files that you can so you can commit it. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=