From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 28 16:25:22 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5D40106568E for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2008 16:25:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dak.col@gmail.com) Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com (rv-out-0506.google.com [209.85.198.232]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A55BA8FC0A for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2008 16:25:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dak.col@gmail.com) Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id b25so1573037rvf.43 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2008 09:25:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=mdXiNpV3M+neEoKiGbQcfg3wTqeqOZ3dL0z2S9GC0co=; b=UsYkWysCBpEU8uEF4TiPjMJWuXlVHAW8rLxP4FcnXNb7Eqre7hvdir4UWSankgZ6qq fXLtIvmRVwojHnq/Ez3Ij7tm80phA4+J9q94lfTbQcLBruqNnSaWWqKEk2oOc8fh2P9b SACy8VmLW3FMlTFtdZNIVYj+AQpdocSpArrS0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=RytPldMDSO5YCuGPxIIBFJj7s4ZviXL+4YbwztJ3pWjChXhwOhSUOmYGkhR2/ipcLW k18jI5iDbtWkUh+f9NXQFTdjLFJNF1BCMxPyVVDVKr60cdHYAtcVBzcGwQuCj/jDkzPA C7guHaGLJzbO42YwFzU6Kfnm1m61+/Tw7DdJA= Received: by 10.142.179.12 with SMTP id b12mr1717942wff.282.1222619122505; Sun, 28 Sep 2008 09:25:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.240.12 with HTTP; Sun, 28 Sep 2008 09:25:17 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3b93bd110809280925i2a99efd7qf733658d7c23fd74@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2008 11:25:17 -0500 From: "Diego F. Arias R." To: "Bill Moran" In-Reply-To: <20080928121713.5c905a40.wmoran@potentialtech.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <00d101c92154$691f53c0$3b5dfb40$@com> <48DF78C3.9080401@infracaninophile.co.uk> <20080928165534.X96877@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <20080928121713.5c905a40.wmoran@potentialtech.com> Cc: Wojciech Puchar , Danny Do , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Hard disk bottle neck. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2008 16:25:22 -0000 On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 11:17 AM, Bill Moran wrote: > Wojciech Puchar wrote: >> >> after you recompile the kernel with that patch, check your disk >> performance in some directory consisting of many large files >> >> cd that_dir >> for x in *;do (cat $x >/dev/null &);done >> >> while running systat,:vmstat on another console > > More specifically, do this before and after you make the change, to > demonstrate whether or not you actually fixed the problem. > > -- > Bill Moran > http://www.potentialtech.com > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > do you check gstat? If the patch dont works, maybe yoy may try to split the raid (2 raid 5) or better use a raid 10. The raid 5 isnt a top performance raid. -- mmm, interesante.....