From owner-freebsd-net Mon Dec 7 18:35:28 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id SAA24277 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Mon, 7 Dec 1998 18:35:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from set.scient.com (set.Scient.COM [208.29.209.254]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id SAA24272 for ; Mon, 7 Dec 1998 18:35:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from enkhyl@scient.com) Received: by set.scient.com; (5.65v4.0/1.3/10May95) id AA28242; Mon, 7 Dec 1998 18:35:05 -0800 Received: from somewhere by smtpxd Date: Mon, 7 Dec 1998 18:35:00 -0800 (PST) From: Christopher Nielsen X-Sender: enkhyl@ender.sf.scient.com Reply-To: Christopher Nielsen To: Tony Kimball Cc: net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: resolver behaviour In-Reply-To: <13932.13268.182705.435207@avalon.east> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Mon, 7 Dec 1998, Tony Kimball wrote: > : If you send a query to one of your local name servers > : for broken-dns.com, and that name server tells you that broken-dns.com > : doesn't exist, it does not good to send this query to the rest of > : your local servers, since they'll just send a similar set of queries > : out to the Internet, get similar responses, and finally tell you that > : broken-dns.com doesn't exist. > > This is the theory of dns, but in practice this is not the case. > NXDOMAIN replies are issued in cases where a valid mapping exists, and > can be obtained from another name server. Repeating this fact is > now wearisome. I don't think there is a misunderstanding about what you want to do. I think the issue is that the solution you're suggesting is a misplaced hack to something that isn't broken. As has been stated previously by many others, the solution to this problem is NOT to hack the resolver (this is not the location of the problem), but to have the domain administrator fix the problem with their broken DNS. I agree with Jordan's response. Present these changes to Paul Vixie. If you can convince him that this is desired and needed functionality (I'm not convinced that it is), then it might be worth discussing. Something tells me that there is a reason this has not been implemented before (this doesn't seem to be a new idea). -- Christopher Nielsen Scient: The eBusiness Systems Innovator cnielsen@scient.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message