Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2015 06:36:45 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> To: Kubilay Kocak <koobs@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Mathieu Arnold <mat@FreeBSD.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r396248 - head/games/scummvm Message-ID: <20150908063644.GA58868@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <55EE412F.4080802@FreeBSD.org> References: <201509070625.t876PBJV079503@repo.freebsd.org> <663DB8E120502884DE748209@atuin.in.mat.cc> <20150907070846.GA23292@FreeBSD.org> <55EE412F.4080802@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 12:00:15PM +1000, Kubilay Kocak wrote:
> I advocate verbose by default across the board in the ports I maintain
> already. Our defaults should be conducive to debug-ability, particularly
> for the case of users providing feedback for maintainers.
>
> How about we exp-run for GNU_CONFIGURE=yes ports:
>
> CONFIGURE_ARGS+= --disable-silent-rules
> MAKE_ENV+= V=1 (maybe even MAKE_ARGS)
One problem here is that lots of ports have configure scripts generated
before silent rules idea existed (and thus have no --disable-silent-rules
switch). However, I agree that such an exp-run is useful: we can see the
old/new configure scripts distribution.
After all, we can always grep ${CONFIGURE_SCRIPT} for see if they support
some kind of build verbosity support and amend CONFIGURE_ARGS accordingly.
./danfe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20150908063644.GA58868>