From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 10 13:16:43 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 705C316A427 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 13:16:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vd@datamax.bg) Received: from jengal.datamax.bg (jengal.datamax.bg [82.103.104.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E70F443D45 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 13:16:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vd@datamax.bg) Received: from qlovarnika.bg.datamax (qlovarnika.bg.datamax [192.168.10.2]) by jengal.datamax.bg (Postfix) with SMTP id F0AFCB830; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 15:16:40 +0200 (EET) Received: (nullmailer pid 85864 invoked by uid 1002); Thu, 10 Nov 2005 13:16:40 -0000 Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 15:16:40 +0200 From: Vasil Dimov To: Kris Kennaway Message-ID: <20051110131640.GA85826@qlovarnika.bg.datamax> References: <20051109165951.GA75924@qlovarnika.bg.datamax> <20051109170437.GW28443@droso.net> <20051109182405.GB27053@xor.obsecurity.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="XF85m9dhOBO43t/C" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051109182405.GB27053@xor.obsecurity.org> X-OS: FreeBSD 6.0-STABLE User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SHA256 checksums X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: vd@datamax.bg List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 13:16:43 -0000 --XF85m9dhOBO43t/C Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="CE+1k2dSO48ffgeK" Content-Disposition: inline --CE+1k2dSO48ffgeK Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 01:24:05PM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote: > If someone can do this in a way that is=20 >=20 > *** Careful *** >=20 > i.e. they: >=20 > * verify that they are not committing random other changes together > with the sha checksum >=20 > * deal with the fact that 'make checksum' on their machine may not add > checksums for all of the files listed in distinfo (and in such a case > will actually remove them, breaking the port for others) >=20 > then it would be better to do them in batches instead of getting > committers to deal with hundreds of individual PRs. Ok, here is a tool that takes a ports dir and hacks it, adding sha256 sums for the available distfiles. A diff from my ports dir can be found at: http://vdev.datamax.bg/tmp/ports_sha256.diff.gz (655 distfiles available) --=20 Vasil Dimov --CE+1k2dSO48ffgeK-- --XF85m9dhOBO43t/C Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iD8DBQFDc0g3Fw6SP/bBpCARAqphAJ9m72Fuiye30sQNlmq8HagJF0VXJACfRRu0 od5AWng5TOG5AeNr7PsE9Uw= =9Sd0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --XF85m9dhOBO43t/C--