Date: Sun, 06 Apr 1997 21:43:31 +0200 From: albast <albast@xs4all.nl> To: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sendmail in 2.2 Message-ID: <1.5.4.32.19970406194331.00885b6c@xs4all.nl>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 14:14 6-4-97 -0000, mark wrote: >Are we ready for religious wars? I certainly think that qmail should be >an optional MTA for freebsd (if it can't be the default). I agree. > Admittedly, you have to do things 'differently' with qmail, but arguably, the >'different' way is the way it should always have been. > >Let the people decide! If the port already exists, why isn't it in there? > >-mark > Well.. this is where I 'disagree'.. I think it's more a matter of opinion. Personally, I hate the way qmail is implemented. But arguably or not, it seems only fair to have qmail in the ports collection along with the few other MTA's available, and let ppl decide which one they like using most. Regards, Jeroen Hogeveen, J.Hogeveen@twiddle.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1.5.4.32.19970406194331.00885b6c>