Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 17:32:57 +0200 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> To: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@freebsd.org> Cc: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NOCRYPT / NOSECURE Message-ID: <xzphe7wmdhy.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: <20030515145721.GA68695@sunbay.com> (Ruslan Ermilov's message of "Thu, 15 May 2003 17:57:21 %2B0300") References: <xzpr870mgvb.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <20030515145721.GA68695@sunbay.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ruslan Ermilov <ru@freebsd.org> writes: > On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 04:20:08PM +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > I would therefore like to remove NOSECURE, preferably before 5.1. > Please go ahead. See attached patch. > > NO_OPENSSL is also a subset of NOCRYPT. There is so little that > > builds with NO_OPENSSL but not with NOCRYPT that I think it might be > > worthwhile to deprecate NO_OPENSSL and change the description of > > NOCRYPT from "will prevent building of crypt versions" to "do not > > build crypto-related software" > I'm not so sure about NO_OPENSSL. What crypto stuff do we have that doesn't use OpenSSL? As far as I can determine, there's only ed(1) and bdes(1) (which use libcipher but should probably use libcrypt instead) and some (but not all) of the cryptography-related kernel modules (for which there should be a separate option). DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzphe7wmdhy.fsf>