From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 24 19:36:43 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D68F4106566B for ; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 19:36:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cwhiteh@onetel.com) Received: from honeysuckle.london.02.net (honeysuckle.london.02.net [87.194.255.144]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B2368FC19 for ; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 19:36:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from eco.config (93.97.24.219) by honeysuckle.london.02.net (8.5.124.10) id 4C884E6F005B4EAE; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 20:36:41 +0100 Message-ID: <4C9CFDC9.5030707@onetel.com> Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 20:36:41 +0100 From: Chris Whitehouse User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20091212) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alejandro Imass References: <4C9B8360.6090100@onetel.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: User Questions Subject: Re: which perl? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 19:36:43 -0000 Alejandro Imass wrote: > On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 12:42 PM, Chris Whitehouse wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Todays ports tree has lang/perl5.10 and lang/perl5.12. A new 8.1-RELEASE >> jail in tinderbox using this ports tree is using perl5.10 by default. Should >> I leave this as is or should I be using 5.12? >> > > IMHO 5.10 is new enough! But the great thing about the Perl community > is that it usually respects previous versions not like some other > crazy, irresponsible "communities" such as PHP who can break your code > from 5.2 to 5.3. Doesn't sound like there are strong reasons for going for 5.12 so I'll stick with the default. thanks Chris