Date: 19 Mar 2002 12:14:27 -0800 From: swear@blarg.net (Gary W. Swearingen) To: parv <parv_@yahoo.com> Cc: Lowell Gilbert <lowell@world.std.com>, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: installing xemacs21 w/ minimum packages Message-ID: <14zo148gd8.o14@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <20020319175842.GA31005@moo.holy.cow> References: <20020319080130.GA16769@moo.holy.cow> <443cywsggu.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <20020319175842.GA31005@moo.holy.cow>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
parv <parv_@yahoo.com> writes: > you are quite perceptive. personally, i prefer vi(m); xemacs is for > those rare occasions when people other than myself use my laptop & > ask for emacs. come to think of it, editors other than vi clones > should be ok too for said people. The default "jed" configuration is very Emacsy -- even split windows and shell-in-a-window. 150K binary + 400K slang library. Sadly, it was recently removed from the install CD, leaving several much-less worthy editors. :( It's still a port. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?14zo148gd8.o14>