From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Feb  3 16:42:11 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFD6616A4CE
	for <freebsd-performance@freebsd.org>;
	Thu,  3 Feb 2005 16:42:11 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from web41205.mail.yahoo.com (web41205.mail.yahoo.com
	[66.218.93.38])	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9EC5F43D49
	for <freebsd-performance@freebsd.org>;
	Thu,  3 Feb 2005 16:42:11 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from arne_woerner@yahoo.com)
Received: (qmail 96118 invoked by uid 60001); 3 Feb 2005 16:42:10 -0000
Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
	s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;
	b=fGBaAHkrKnRGHihuvpQFEcsu2Ge5No56urRAdlfn137qMT/XTZSvPri0OHMgTjlnQAQyrVplyEplMB/hLytIWyuXkxreTVzX5qwQlwjFHyGtgaTlwOLsmk7+WfwC0O37/auz0iXU8Hi0h5S7HvmUciTE7frMm4JGdyQBBCNWjnk=
	;
Message-ID: <20050203164210.96116.qmail@web41205.mail.yahoo.com>
Received: from [83.129.195.144] by web41205.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP;
	Thu, 03 Feb 2005 08:42:09 PST
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2005 08:42:09 -0800 (PST)
From: Arne "Wörner" <arne_woerner@yahoo.com>
To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1050203144140.3610E-100000@fledge.watson.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Subject: Re: FreeBSD 5.3 I/O Performance / Linux 2.6.10 | Continued
	Discussion
X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Performance/tuning <freebsd-performance.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance>,
	<mailto:freebsd-performance-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-performance>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-performance@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-performance-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance>,
	<mailto:freebsd-performance-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 16:42:12 -0000

I just tested R5.1 with a
  time -c "dd if=/dev/zero of=a bs=64k count=1000 ; fsync a"
and it was 4 or about 4 times fast than with R5.3.

Is it smart to start looking for regressive changes in sys/dev/ata
or in /sys/kern?

I mean: Did somebody see this phaenomenon on a SCSI disc, too?

-Arne




		
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
The all-new My Yahoo! - What will yours do?
http://my.yahoo.com