From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Aug 17 14:08:49 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86B3D16A4CE
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Tue, 17 Aug 2004 14:08:49 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from c00l3r.networx.ch (c00l3r.networx.ch [62.48.2.2])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B47DB43D39
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Tue, 17 Aug 2004 14:08:48 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from andre@freebsd.org)
Received: (qmail 35514 invoked from network); 17 Aug 2004 14:08:06 -0000
Received: from dotat.atdotat.at (HELO [62.48.0.47]) ([62.48.0.47])
          (envelope-sender <andre@freebsd.org>)
          by c00l3r.networx.ch (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP
          for <brad@stop.mail-abuse.org>; 17 Aug 2004 14:08:06 -0000
Message-ID: <4122116C.8010409@freebsd.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 16:08:44 +0200
From: Andre Oppermann <andre@freebsd.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US;
	rv:1.7) Gecko/20040608
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Brad Knowles <brad@stop.mail-abuse.org>
References: <200408170822.32183.jhandvil@tampabay.rr.com>
	<61422.1092748299@bizet.nethelp.no> <p06002015bd47bfc7dd15@[10.0.1.2]>
In-Reply-To: <p06002015bd47bfc7dd15@[10.0.1.2]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
cc: jhandvil@tampabay.rr.com
cc: current@freebsd.org
cc: sthaug@nethelp.no
Subject: Re: RFC: Alternate patch to have true new-style rc.d scripts 	in
	ports(without touching localpkg)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 14:08:49 -0000

Brad Knowles wrote:
> At 3:11 PM +0200 2004-08-17, sthaug@nethelp.no wrote:
> 
>>  - Why cannot /usr/local/etc/rc.d be used with rcorder if /etc/rc.d/local
>>  is okay?
> 
>     You can't guarantee that /usr/local is on the same filesystem as 
> /etc (and available early in the boot process), and while you can't 
> guarantee that /etc/rc.d/local is also on the same filesytem, it's a lot 
> easier for some people to guarantee.
> 
>     Moreover, many sites may mount /usr read-only, or /usr/local non-suid.

So?  How does this prevent rc scripts being used from /usr or /usr/local?

-- 
Andre